Docs Still Don’t Know Nic
New research from the Rutgers School of Public Health finds that American doctors are still shockingly ignorant when it comes to nicotine
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
The study was conducted by lead author Bover Manderski, and supported by Steinberg, Wackowski, Singh, Young, and Delnevo. It was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
The team amassed data from 926 clinicians, looking at their comprehension of nicotine and nicotine use. In particular, it asked them how much nicotine use results in cardiovascular disease, low birth weight, birth defect, cancers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and depression.
“One might expect this misperception to be limited to the general population, but research studies have also documented such misperception among healthcare professionals. For example, a 2007 study found that 60% of nurses incorrectly perceived nicotine as carcinogenic,” they wrote.
Fourteen years and zero progress.
In fact, the same team conducted research in 2018 and found “that a majority of doctors ‘strongly agreed’ that “nicotine directly contributes” to the development of CVD, COPD, and cancer”.
This time around, they discovered findings of perceptions about nicotine “vary by physician gender and specialty”. The team believes it may be subject to selection bias - physicians who chose to participate in the survey differ from those who did not with respect to their perceptions about nicotine.
Regardless of split, the headline figure that 75% of doctors failed to understand the basic truth about nicotine, and are responsible for issuing advice to the general public, is shocking and a clear danger to the health of the nation, especially when it comes to safer alternatives to smoking such as vaping.
The team wrote: “The proportion of surveyed physicians who believe that nicotine directly contributes to these health outcomes is alarmingly high.”
The lead author told journalists at Filter Magazine: “It is very important for physicians to understand the relative harm between nicotine and the other 7,000 toxins in tobacco smoke. This is especially important as physicians play a key role in recommending and prescribing FDA-approved nicotine replacement medications.”
Adding, “respondents may have made judgements and overestimations about the probability that nicotine causes harm based on the ease with which they associate nicotine and cigarettes more generally”.
One omission to the survey was whether doctors felt the nicotine in patches, gums, and sprays offers this misperceived level of harm too.
They concluded: “Our findings demonstrate that question wording is important when measuring physician beliefs about nicotine. However, even after accounting for question version, misperceptions about the direct health effects of nicotine were common, and perceptions about nicotine varied by sex and specialty. Provider education about tobacco and nicotine should be prioritised in order to optimise patient–provider communications about tobacco use and cessation.”
References:
- Persistent Misperceptions about Nicotine among US Physicians: Results from a Randomized Survey Experiment - https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7713/htm
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
Longfills as an Alternative to Disposables
The disposable vape ban will impact many people, but there’s no reason to be concerned… Grab yourself a pod kit and a Longfill and you’ll be back to vaping the way you want to, just in a cheaper, more environmentally friendly and legal way.
COP10 is a Threat to Safer Nicotine Products
The EU obscures its position on low-risk alternatives to smoking before the WHO COP10 conference in Panama, starting Monday
-
by Dave Cross
Nicotine Is Not A Culprit
Planet of the Vapes has always encouraged smokers to use the quit product that works best for them, and snus is a product that seems to be unfairly blocked because it contains nicotine
-
by Dave Cross
