Quebec Court Conclusion
Justice Daniel Dumais struck a blow for common sense in Quebec and ruled that sections of its implementation of the Tobacco Control Act were invalid
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
Quebec had prohibited the demonstration of vape products within vape stores (and quit smoking venues) and barred the dissemination of harm reduction information. Lawyers for the Associations argued that these prohibitions contravened “the right to integrity and personal security as well as freedom of expression”.
The full restrictions placed on vaping:
- Everyone buying vaping devices must produce proof of age
- Vaping devices not to be sold where tobacco products are sold
- Vaping banned everywhere smoking isn’t allowed
- Vaping devices banned from display, except in vape stores as long as they aren’t visible from outside
- Vape shops only allowed to show availability and prices
- Vape shops and manufacturers subject to the same restrictions on advertising as tobacco companies
- Free samples and liquid testing banned
- Vape shops must register with the government
Government lawyers relied on tired arguments; referring to the supposed gateway effect and a bastardisation of the precautionary principal to justify policies that fly in the face of Health Canada’s position that vaping offers “a viable means for smokers to reduce their exposure to toxic products”.
Justice Daniel Dumais ruled that this exceeded the province’s powers. He announced that he was suspending ruling for six months but instructed legislators to use the time to redraft Quebec’s tobacco law and remove the sections causing a problem.
Dumais also that banning advertising information about using vaping to quit smoking, aimed at smokers, was also illegal. He wrote: “Overall, the law is constitutional. Quebec has jurisdiction to legislate as it has done. The Quebec legislature has jurisdiction and could validly pass the contested laws.”
“The problem with the current restrictions is that the public - particularly smokers - do not distinguish between smoking and vaping. They must be permitted to know the difference. Rather than silence, it is sometimes necessary to educate and let people know that vaping exists first and foremost for smokers.”
Vape storeowner Linda Boyer-Fawcett spoke about her happiness at the decision to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation: “Our windows will not have to be frosted anymore. From the outside, if you don't what I'm doing inside, it looks like a trap house. It looks like a place you wouldn't let your husband go.”
“I was a smoker from the age of 13 to 33. The vaping, as soon as I tried it, I haven't smoked after that. My first job is definitely to discourage non-smokers to use it.”
Not everyone is happy at Justice Dumais’ decision. Flory Doucas of the Quebec Coalition for Tobacco Control, mistakenly believes it is a setback in the fight against tobacco-related harm.
Repeating some of the myths about flavours and packaging, she said: “For this ruling to come and invalidate some of these measures, specifically the ones that speak to advertising, I think it's really upsetting. I think that the most worrisome thing is that kids who use these products are two to four times more likely to become smokers of conventional cigarettes.”
The government has thirty days to appeal the verdict.
Resources:
- Canadian Vaping Association - http://canadianvapingassociation.org
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Parliament Fears Two
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs faced questions from a Conservative MP and, oddly, a member of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
-
by Dave Cross
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
Sacrificing Health For 2p Cut
Tory Government alienates vaping voters with its mission to cut tax by an unaffordable 2p to attract voters by placing a tax on vape products in the forthcoming budget
-
by Dave Cross
Parliament
Andrea Leadsom has been quizzed by Rupa Huq and Derek Thomas about the promotion of vaping and support to those who want to quit
-
by Dave Cross
