Vaping News

Indian Docs Debate Ban

India's best-known doctors debate tobacco harm reduction on the third anniversary of the e-cigarette ban

Share on:
India's best-known doctors have debated tobacco harm reduction on the third anniversary of the e-cigarette ban during an online event. Policy Circle is one of the leading multimedia platforms for in-depth discussions on economy, policy and governance. It hosted a roundtable on 'Tobacco Harm Reduction – Risks and Benefits' to mark three years to India's ban on Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS).

The roundtable was in continuation of the earlier discussions where experts such as parliamentarians, lawmakers, eminent doctors, and policymakers deliberated on India's tobacco policy and highlighted the need of harm reduction. Three years after the ban, the market is flooded with illegal products.

There is growing concern about the unregulated use electronic nicotine delivery systems, or ENDS, especially among parents about their rampant use among young children.

Senior Consultant Dr K Madan Gopal said: “The government policies in the last two decades have brought in a big shift in the attitude towards tobacco addiction and cessation. In my opinion, harm reduction is not substitution. We need to prevent tobacco usage.”

Dr MC Misra added: “People need assistance in quitting, but everyone does not have the will power or sufficient socioeconomic wherewithal to enrol in programmes. There is a need for a team of trained people in all hospitals for cessation programmes.”

The Director of New Delhi’s National Chest Centre, Dr Bharat Gopal spoke on the subject of the potential of tobacco harm reduction: “There is a need for appropriate regulation as it cannot be all or none phenomena. While underage children have easy access to such products, the medical community which uses them for smoking cessation programmes cannot use them because of the ban. Neither smoking nor vaping is good for health. There is a need to sit together and understand that there is no choice but to regulate them. India currently follows a 'quit or die' policy that needs to be reviewed.”

Dr Atul Ambekar, a Professor at the National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, added: “The addiction aspect for tobacco use disorders or tobacco control policies are often neglected, which is not the case with other such disorders such as alcohol addiction. By allowing combustible cigarettes and banning e-cigarettes, India is working towards harm maximisation. We think banned items are not available but, what the ban actually means is that the government has abdicated the responsibility to regulate them. The absence of a harm reduction category in India, has given an impetus to the dangers of combustible cigarettes.”

Dr Sunita Gupta, Professor at the Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, agreed with Dr Ambekar’s position: “Bans do not work – they will only create underground economies. Making cigarettes expensive has led to people shifting to beedis and chewing tobacco.”

Professor Dr Nimesh G Desai concluded the discussion and summed up the larger viewpoints: “There seems to be a consensus on the need for harm reduction as an approach for tobacco cessation. I believe that substitution is the way to tackle the challenge, even NRT (Nicotine Replacement Therapy) is substitution. Eventually, there will be more accommodation for scientific evidence and not being governed by morality or absolute principles.”

The attendees noted that several countries already successfully employ harm reduction methods to reduce the levels of morbidity and mortality from tobacco use is harm reduction.

The collected advocates of tobacco harm reduction approaches said that it is difficult to lure smokers away from tobacco. While 70% of the smokers are willing to quit, only 8% of them are able to do it. People use tobacco products because they are addicted to nicotine. Nicotine is a highly addictive substance, but it is not the cause of diseases linked to tobacco use. It is the other toxins contained in tobacco smoke that cause cancer and other deadly diseases.

The supporters of harm reduction support delivery of nicotine through a range of products such as electronic cigarettes and 'heat not burn' products that, they say, are in the lowest end of the spectrum of harm.

Dave Cross avatar

Dave Cross

Journalist at POTV
View Articles

Dave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.

Join the discussion

Vaping News

Harm Reduction For The Rich

The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance

Vaping News

CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws

The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia

Vaping News

A Missed Opportunity at COP10

The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives

Vaping News

COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction

Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10