Opposition To Prescribed Vapes
Professors Jørgen Vestbo, Andrew Bush, and Jonathan Grigg have written in the British Medical Journal to detail their opposition to ecigs being made available for prescription
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
“There is already enough nicotine addiction,” state Vestbo, Bush, and Grigg as if vaping is increasing the number of nicotine users – running against the evidence accumulated over the last ten years.
“For decades, smoking rates in the UK have been declining, and few teenagers see themselves becoming smokers,” they continue, forgetting to highlight that the decline increased as vaping boomed in the United Kingdom in both adult and teen smokers. Worse, they deny that quitting increased over the last ten years.
Begrudgingly, they admit that switching from smoking to vaping would result in reduced harm and lower incidents of respiratory disease but argue that switching is not how people should quit – despite vaping now the most popular form of quitting in the UK and research showing smokers find quitting around three times easier than using traditional approaches.
No, they bang the gong for the old approaches that failed members of the Planet of the Vapes forum so many times until they discovered electronic cigarettes: “We have an arsenal of evidence-based tools, such as further increases in taxation and decreased availability, that can further reduce smoking prevalence with far less risk of known—and unknown—adverse health effects.”
Unknown health effects? Vestbo, Bush, and Grigg appear to want to ignore the evidence of over ten years of use in favour of unknowns, a clear example of the perfect being the enemy of the good.
Their words insult researchers who have demonstrated the efficacy of vaping, calling it “remarkably poorly studied”, including work by University College London, reports by Public Health England, and gold standard research led by Professor Peter Hajek.
They point to the Bloomberg-funded talking points:
- Promotes dual use
- Debunked links to Evali
- Tobacco company link ad-homs
- Knocking the 95% safer figure
- Toxins – without reference to comparative levels
- Marketed to teens
- A teen gateway effect
But then is anybody surprised that people from the European Respiratory Society continue to propagate such lies and myths?
Fortunately, Nicholas Hopkinson, a professor of respiratory medicine and the chair of Action on Smoking and Health provides a response, saying the measure should be welcomed.
“Around 3.9 million people in the UK use e-cigarettes, two thirds of whom are now ex-smokers. Vaping by people who have never smoked remains rare, and in children and young people it is almost exclusively carried out among those who have been smokers or still are,” he says.
Hopkinson concludes: “There are still more than six million people who smoke in the UK: medicinal licensing of e-cigarettes could help many of them to live longer, healthier lives.”
References:
- Should e-cigarettes be licensed as medicines? - https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.n2912
Photo Credit:
Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
-
by Dave Cross
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
-
by Dave Cross
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10
-
by Dave Cross
