COP Concerns
Advocates for tobacco harm reduction approaches and vaping have spoken out about the unaccountable World Health Organisation, how COP9 is “concerning”, and how prohibition damages public health
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
Writing for CapX [1], Adam Afriyie says that Brexit has opened up opportunities to expand our approach to tobacco harm reduction and wonders why we need to listen to “the unaccountable, unscientific WHO on vaping”.
“To me, the argument has always been clear: smokers are primarily addicted to the nicotine, but it’s the smoking that kills them. So if they can’t quit, why not let them get their nicotine in far less harmful ways? Seems simple, right? Perhaps too simple. Either way, the EU did what it does so well and found a way to drastically over-complicate things.”
Afriyie is concerned that the “unaccountable, unscientific” WHO will replace the EU’s influence over our policy decisions.
“Despite having a country, the UK, who adopted electronic cigarettes as a tool to curb its smoking rate, it is alarming that WHO commissions poor quality research and perpetuates misinformation campaigns against them. In the future, we will see if other countries follow the UK’s lead on safer alternative products, forcing WHO to admit its mistakes,” says Professor Riccardo Polosa [2].
His is deeply concerned about this week’s COP: “numerous issues remain obscure, for instance, the lack of a serious discussion on tobacco harm reduction, and secrecy surrounding the topics to be discussed. A practice is driven by a censorship approach that does not accurately reflect current tobacco control policies that are enigmatic, not based on science, and based on censorship of media outlets. The FCTC has lost sight of its original purpose: to ensure safe and healthy lives for everyone, wherever they live in the world.”
Clive Bates builds on this concern and examines how the WHO “aggressively” promotes the banning of safer alternatives such as vapes, snus, and heated tobacco products [3].
“The effect,” he says, “if not the intent, is to protect the cigarette trade from competition, to promote black markets, to stimulate harmful workarounds, to nurture criminal networks, to harm young people, and to prolong the epidemic of avoidable smoking related-disease.
“It’s a reckless policy, built on misplaced righteousness, defended by bureaucratic inertia, sustained by group-think, and cultivated by elitist billionaire foundation money. It’s a curse and a blight on public health, and government representatives should apply real-world policy disciplines and reject it.”
References:
- Britain should not listen to the unaccountable, unscientific WHO on vaping - https://capx.co/britain-should-not-listen-to-the-unaccountable-unscientific-who-on-vaping/
- COP9/Riccardo Polosa - https://cataniaconversation.coehar.org/2021/11/05/cop9-riccardo-polosa-im-deeply-concerned-by-whos-lack-of-interest-in-global-developments-towards-safer-nicotine-products/
- Prohibitionists at work: how the WHO damages public health through hostility to tobacco harm reduction - https://clivebates.com/prohibitionists-at-work-how-the-who-damages-public-health-through-hostility-to-tobacco-harm-reduction/
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
-
by Dave Cross
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
-
by Dave Cross
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10
-
by Dave Cross
