Vaping News

NTR Clarifies Tobacco Industry Policy

Marcus Munafo provides an update on the Nicotine & Tobacco Research journal’s policy regarding publishing manuscripts written by the Tobacco industry

Share on:
In an editorial written by Marcus Munafo, the Nicotine & Tobacco Research journal has provided clarification on its policy regarding publishing manuscripts written by the Tobacco industry. It amounts to a breath of fresh air where research evidence should be debated on the science and not focussed on the organisations producing it.

The current issue of Nicotine & Tobacco Research (SRNT) carries an article from the tobacco industry which looks at biomarkers of potential harm and heat-not-burn products. Munafo says it is rare for the journal to do such a thing but, “for some even one article is too many”.

Our policy has always been to broadly align the journal’s policies with those of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT), which owns the journal. This is not strictly necessary, but is in our view logical. Currently, employees of the tobacco industry cannot be SRNT members, while employees of other industries (e.g., the pharmaceutical industry, the ENDS industry – as long as the company is not owned wholly or in part by a tobacco company), or who consult for or receive tobacco industry funding – can be members,” he writes (1).

He adds that SRNT has recently completed a review of its policy on engaging with the tobacco industry and those who receive grants from it.

Munafo says: “SRNT is a scientific society whose mission is to stimulate the generation and dissemination of new knowledge concerning nicotine and tobacco in all its manifestations, from cellular to societal, across research disciplines, with the ultimate goal of reducing the harms of tobacco and nicotine containing products around the globe.”

In short, SRNT believes in debate not ideologically driven censorship, although he does note, “the tobacco industry has a long history of attempting to subvert science for profit (and causing considerable harm to human health).”

Eschewing the selection of one side of the debate or other, Munafo states that, “science should be judged on its merits, irrespective of its origins”. And, with this position, the journal places faith in its editors and the review process to promote this satisfactorily.

The word that is prominent in editorial is “transparency”. For data, funding and authorship, SRNT has a commitment to ensure openness to guarantee confidence in its actions.

However, we are not complacent – we are aware that the situation continues to evolve, as the wider nicotine and tobacco research and policy landscape evolves. For this reason, we are launching a themed issue to explore these issues and present a range of perspectives. This will not resolve the tension, but will allow readers to consider the full range of views held across our community, as they currently stand.”

The SRNT has taken a bold and mature approach, and one that will serve the research community well. With over 7 million UK smokers, the country will benefit from a more rational discussion.


  1. Nicotine & Tobacco Research Policy on the Tobacco Industry -

Photo Credit:

Dave Cross avatar

Dave Cross

Journalist at POTV
View Articles

Dave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.

Join the discussion

Vaping News

Harm Reduction For The Rich

The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance

Vaping News

CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws

The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia

Vaping News

A Missed Opportunity at COP10

The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives

Vaping News

COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction

Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10