Putting The Dead Into Deadline
The FDA’s vape business application process closes on Wednesday 9th September and signals the death of vape businesses across the whole of the United States
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
Chris Allen, Broughton Nicotine Services’ vice president of scientific and regulatory affairs, told Tobacco Reporter: “Those working towards a PMTA have benefited most as this [the deadline change] has either provided the time to complete existing studies or generate more data. Also, those that are intending to exit the market have a slight reprieve in that they can continue selling their products for an extra 120 days.”
Nobody in the independent sector, priced out of business by the cost of the application process, will be celebrating those 120 days. Products will vanish from shelves, employees will lose jobs, and businesses will shut the door for the final time.
Allen’s statement also fails to reflect the impact COVID has had on business activity during the last few months. ECigIntelligence don’t think the impact of the deadline will be immediate, but it will eventually hit everybody. It predicts fewer companies and many of the well-known brands vanishing, but “we don’t expect the FDA to start enforcement immediately on brands that have not submitted a PMTA application”.
Avail Vapor, a company that received investment from Altria, voiced concern that this will inevitably see a shift from vaping back to smoking, it’s a view shared by investment website The Motley Fool (TMF): “Because the cost of complying with the regulations is staggeringly high, many manufacturers will not be able to make it over the hurdle, and the e-cig market will be left largely to the tobacco giants.”
The FDA is shouting that 650 PMTAs is a reflection of the success of the process, but it isn’t telling the whole truth. An example of this is that Philip Morris International placed four applications just for its IQOS product as separate ones are needed for the product and the flavours.
The Rocky Mountain Smoke-Free Association estimated that each PMTA would end up costing a business in excess of £6.5 million for each product and each juice flavour. As a result, the trade body reckons more than fourteen thousand businesses will go to the wall, resulting in layoffs running to well over 150,000.
“The e-cig market is about to become significantly smaller in just a few days, a change that is not necessarily better for trying to wean smokers away from traditional cigarettes,” concludes TMF.
Not even the giants are finding the going easy. Juul announced that it has cut a third of its staff during 2020 and now announces plans to scale back operations outside of the USA – creating further unemployment.
Related:
- The Motley Fool – [link]
- Tobacco Reporter – [link]
- More jobs to go as Juul feels heat, The Times – [link]
Photo Credit:
-
Image by Able Lingo from Pixabay
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
-
by Dave Cross
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
-
by Dave Cross
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10
-
by Dave Cross
