The Sad Truth About Bans
The sad truth of the anti-harm reduction approach taken in San Francisco is that although they succeeded in reducing vaping – smoking rates went up again!
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
In 2018, residents of San Francisco were asked “Shall the City ordinance prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products in San Francisco take effect?” They voted on this as part of the election of officials. The build-up to the vote was dominated by billionaire Michael Bloomberg flooding the city with millions to taint the process as a fight against ‘Big Tobacco’, rather than an argument about tobacco harm reduction and saving lives. Once the votes were in, the ‘Yes’ vote won by 164,844 to 76,193. [link]
So began the slog towards puritanism and away from evidence. By 2019, flavoured eliquids has been banned and legislators were pushing for more – with San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton declaring: “We don’t want them [vape products and companies] in our city.”
Director of Public Health Dr Grant Colfax supported the outright ban proposal, saying: “The industry is addicting a whole new generation of youth to nicotine.” The lunatics were holding the keys to the asylum.
An op-ed in Centre Square notes: “Prohibition style bans do nothing to solve the problem cities like San Francisco seek to answer. It’s as if they’ve forgotten what happened in Prohibition – in banning alcohol across the states, Prohibition made the process of buying alcohol less safe for everyone. While the culture things that popped up were fascinating like speakeasies, you also saw gang wars break out and perverse incentives show up when both Baptists and Bootleggers were on the same side for keeping alcohol banned, even though the two groups fundamentally thought about the substance differently.”
Step forward Yang, Lindblom, Salloum, and Ward, researchers from the University of Memphis, Georgetown University Law Centre, and the University of Florida. Addictive Behaviors Reports journal has just published their study where the team looked at the impact of a comprehensive tobacco product flavour ban.
Before commencing work, the team speculated: “Banning flavours in e-cigarettes alone would prompt e-cigarette use cessation and reduce e-cigarette initiation but may also push some e-cigarette users to turn to cigarette smoking and could prompt some youth to initiate into smoking instead of e-cigarette use.”
“Another key concern is whether local or state flavour bans will simply prompt users to obtain their flavoured tobacco products in nearby jurisdictions that still sell them, from illegal local sellers, or through Internet sales, thereby reducing any beneficial public health impacts.”
“Our results indicate that among young adults, comprehensive local flavour bans for tobacco products are likely to reduce the use of tobacco products overall and flavoured tobacco products overall. Specifically, the ban reduced cigarette use and cigar smoking by reducing the use of flavoured tobacco products but can also increase, or not reduce, cigarette smoking as some former users of the banned flavoured tobacco products switch to smoking.”
Seeing as the ban was all about combatting a decline in tobacco tax revenue, champagne corks must be popping in the council offices.
Related:
- “The impact of a comprehensive tobacco product flavor ban in San Francisco among young adults” by Yang , Lindblom , Salloum, and Ward – [link]
- San Francisco needs to admit it was wrong about vaping – [link]
Photo Credit:
Wall image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
-
by Dave Cross
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
-
by Dave Cross
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10
-
by Dave Cross
