Trade Associations Attack WHO

Posted 1st November 2018 by Mawsley
The World Health Organisation (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Conference of the Parties 8 (COP8) took place in Geneva at the beginning of this month. Despite having a remit to promote harm reduction, its reluctance to follow its own protocol has led to a group of trade bodies writing an open letter of disgust.

Before COP8 started, 72 leading experts urged delegates to “embrace tobacco harm reduction”. Prior to that, Clive Bates and (others) had already noted: “the WHO’s ‘hostility to tobacco harm reduction’ is ‘misplaced’, and called on it to change its approach and put ‘the health goal first’.”

The first thing delegates did was to expel vape advocates, accusing them of being in the pay of the tobacco industry, thereby ensuring that all discussions would remain totally secret – not the open transparency they claimed to promote. Then, laughably, harm reduction advocates were slated for being “vicious”.

This week’s letter to The Times was written by:

  • Lizi Jenkins, Board Member of the UK Vaping Industry Association
  • Michael Keneally, Director of Vape Business Ireland
  • Maggie Gowen, Executive Director of the Global Vaping Standards Association
  • Shaun Casey, President of the Canadian Vaping Association
  • Michael Brader, Acting President of the Vaping Trade Association of New Zealand
  • Zodwa Velleman, CEO and Chairperson of the Vaping Products Association of South Africa

The group wrote:

“Calls for reform to global vaping policy have fallen on deaf ears. Following the Eighth Session of the Conference of Parties (COP8) in Geneva this month, the World Health Organization’s tobacco control group has once again refused to acknowledge the need to treat vaping distinctly from smoking.

At COP7 two years ago, the WHO invited member states to ban vaping products outright despite recognising their potential to help reduce global smoking rates — a position as confusing for consumers as it was for public health officials and regulators. International vaping bodies and campaigners led by the UK Vaping Industry Association have issued a call to action to the WHO to remedy this contradiction. Consumer groups and academics have also made separate appeals. Yet it appears that the WHO’s tobacco control group is sticking its fingers in its ears.

Not content with expelling journalists and industry from the proceedings, it has gone as far as to claim that ‘there is no independent research to confirm’ that vaping is less harmful than smoking.

In the UK alone, Public Health England, Action on Smoking Health, the Royal College of Physicians and the Adam Smith Institute must all wonder why the WHO dismisses the integrity of their research.

Equally perplexing is the appointment of the International Agency for Research on Cancer to lead an investigation on vaping products with a view to making recommendations at COP9 in 2020. Lest we forget, IARC reports have historically been tampered with, and advised the WHO on the basis of evidence from scientists with undeclared links to law firms pursuing litigation suits. Public health officials should be deeply concerned that a research agency with such a questionable record will be shaping the agenda for vaping regulation across the world.

The disappointing outcome of COP8 will have an impact that reaches far beyond the vaping sector. In the UK, where smoking rates have fallen in conjunction with the growth of the vaping market, smoking-related diseases are still costing local authorities an average of £760m a year, and the National Health Service £2bn a year. Discouraging policymakers from embracing harm reduction could not only be costing lives — up to 1m a year, according to the Adam Smith Institute — but prevent us from alleviating a substantial public burden.”