Should Flavours Be Banned?
Flavours shouldn’t be banned according to the Yale School of Public Health - San Leandro isn’t listening.
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
Councilman Pete Ballew told his fellow councillors: “I don’t think this ordinance is about catching people selling cigarettes, and I really don’t think it’s about catching kids buying cigarettes; I think it’s bigger than that. This ordinance, to me, is about de-normalising the use of tobacco.”
Plain and simple, this isn’t about the science or evidence – Ballew’s motivations are grounded in a zealotry that believes nobody should have the choice to smoke…or do anything that looks like smoking.
Councilwoman Corina Lopez opposed the ban: “I just ask that we really keep an open mind here and support each other because I think we’re all really well-intentioned and want what’s best for the community, youth and adults. We really want to have a community that is thriving and healthy.”
Stores will have to apply for a licence to sell eliquids. Breaking the new law will result in a written warning. Getting caught a second time will land the vendor with a $2,500 fine. A third infraction will see the vendor banned from making any tobacco-based (and for that read vape) sales for 20 days. A fourth offence will see vendors banned from selling vape products for three years.
Will this result in the region’s vapers being unable to vape flavoured liquids? Absolutely not. All local Bricks & Mortar sales will simply be driven online or vapers will pop across state lines. The ban will be as unenforceable as it is stupid.
Jerry Garcia sits on the San Leandro Board of the Chamber of Commerce, he said: “If you want to save kids, take them off of Twinkies, sugars, soda and all of these other things that kill people. This is America; people have a right to pick their own vices, and they’re all over the place.”
Latest findings from the Yale School of Public Health should give these anti-vape fanatics pause for though. Researchers state that if the Food and Drug Administration instituted a national ban on flavours then e-cigarette use would decline by more than 10%. Also, such a move would turn ex-smokers who vape back to traditional tobacco cigarettes – clearly a retrograde step.
While not telling policy makers what to do, the research team demonstrated that ill-considered bans on eliquid flavours will do nothing other than drive vapers to do the opposite that law makers desire – to increase the rate of smoking.
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Parliament Fears Two
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs faced questions from a Conservative MP and, oddly, a member of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
-
by Dave Cross
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
Sacrificing Health For 2p Cut
Tory Government alienates vaping voters with its mission to cut tax by an unaffordable 2p to attract voters by placing a tax on vape products in the forthcoming budget
-
by Dave Cross
Scotland Announces Single-Use Vape Action
A ban on the sale and supply of single-use vapes in Scotland is due to come into effect on 1 April 2025, under proposed legislation published today
-
by Dave Cross
