Australian Law Protects Big Tobacco
Demands are being made to make nicotine base legal and that the Australian law only protects tobacco companies.
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
Colin Mendelsohn is an Associate Professor in the School of Public Health and Community Medicine at the University of New South Wales. He is widely known for being an advocate of evidence-based policy and a leading expert in tobacco harm reduction.
In his press release, he states: “In Australia, it is illegal to sell, buy, possess or use nicotine other than in tobacco or nicotine replacement products, as nicotine is classified in the Poisons Standard as a Schedule 7 ‘dangerous poison’. The consumer advocacy group, New Nicotine Alliance has submitted an application to exempt low concentrations of nicotine for use in electronic cigarettes as a safer alternative to smoking.”
Mendelsohn, in his position as lead signatory, heads up a list that is like a veritable who’s who of enlightened ecig advocates. It includes Professors John Britton, Jean-François Etter, Linda Bauld, Peter Hajek and doctors Konstantinos and Jacques Le Houezec.
John Britton said: “Nicotine itself is not a significant cause of disease and death. Allowing smokers easier access to nicotine products without the toxins in tobacco smoke could ultimately save millions of lives. Lifting the effective ban on low-risk nicotine products will allow Australian smokers to realise the health benefits this approach has already generated in Europe and the United States. I fully endorse this proposal.”
Ann McNeill added: “I just don’t understand the logic of having nicotine in the deadly form of tobacco cigarettes widely available, while nicotine in the much safer form of e-cigarettes is outlawed by the Poison Standard. The current situation in Australia protects the cigarette business, encourages smoking and increases the risk of disease.”
Sky reported the letter as slamming current Australian policy as being “unethical” and “discriminatory to allow the sale of nicotine in tobacco while banning a 'much lower-risk' alternative.” It reports the group’s claim that there's “no credible evidence to suggest e-cigarettes undermine tobacco control, reduce quit rates or encourage young people to take up smoking.”
At the same time, the authorities are pushing ahead with taking online e-cigarette retailers to court. A Federal Court action is proceeding against The Joystick Company, where it is claimed the product contains formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein. Apparently, this results from the company failing to pay previous fines for “false or misleading representations”.
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Parliament Fears Two
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs faced questions from a Conservative MP and, oddly, a member of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
-
by Dave Cross
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
Sacrificing Health For 2p Cut
Tory Government alienates vaping voters with its mission to cut tax by an unaffordable 2p to attract voters by placing a tax on vape products in the forthcoming budget
-
by Dave Cross
Scotland Announces Single-Use Vape Action
A ban on the sale and supply of single-use vapes in Scotland is due to come into effect on 1 April 2025, under proposed legislation published today
-
by Dave Cross
