Supporting its position, the FDA claimed that the deeming rule was needed because “before today, there was no federal law prohibiting retailers from selling e-cigarettes, hookah tobacco or cigars to people under age 18.” It was a ridiculous statement and one that was swiftly debunked.
The FDA also said that strict regulation had to take place because these products kill people. Lies, Michael Siegel called it. “That the FDA is forced to resort to lying in order to defend its regulations suggests that it realizes it doesn't have a leg to stand on. If there were a legitimate public health reason for putting an onerous, expensive burden on vaping businesses that is going to drive most of them out of business, I'm sure that the FDA would immediately be able to tell us what it is,” he wrote. “The products that are killing people are real cigarettes. And the FDA has chosen to give these cigarettes a completely free ride by putting every possible economic burden in front of much safer smoke-free, tobacco-free cigarettes so that they have little hope of being able to compete with the killer products.”
Finally, in dismissing the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) report, FDA’s Mitch Zeller said: “We have skyrocketing use of e-cigarettes by kids. For whatever reason, you don’t see those kinds of numbers on the other side of the pond.”
Nonsense, according to leading expert Dave Sweanor: “The data’s actually very similar if you measured it the same. In the States, close to 80% of youth who say they’ve used e-cigs have used one that doesn’t even have nicotine in it. To then say that this is a huge problem is pretty ridiculous. You need to identify the problem and carefully tailor what you’re doing to address that problem.”
Unlike the Zeller, Nicopure welcomed the RCP release: “Our UK subsidiary and our European customers now have access to reliable guidance from the Royal College of Physicians regarding our products' potential role in reducing the death and disease toll from cigarettes.”
And, like other commentators, Nicopure slammed the FDA’s position: “The net effect of the Deeming Rule is a regime that arbitrarily frustrates innovations and advances in public health while preserving the status quo that existed in 2007, i.e., a market dominated by cigarettes.”
The company’s lawyers announced their intention to fight the FDA on two fronts in court. Firstly, they posit the FDA has violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The company is also contesting that the FDA have violated the First Amendment “because they block the company from making 'truthful and non-misleading statements' about vaping and 'engaging in other forms of protected expression,' such as distributing free samples."

Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Parliament Fears Two
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs faced questions from a Conservative MP and, oddly, a member of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
Sacrificing Health For 2p Cut
Tory Government alienates vaping voters with its mission to cut tax by an unaffordable 2p to attract voters by placing a tax on vape products in the forthcoming budget
Scotland Announces Single-Use Vape Action
A ban on the sale and supply of single-use vapes in Scotland is due to come into effect on 1 April 2025, under proposed legislation published today