Enoch
Achiever
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2015
- Messages
- 2,295
Looking up on many of the statistics over the Covid-19, i am starting to see a different perspective in how we are managing the pandemic in this country. so let me put this to you.
The average age of death from Covid-19 is 82. So as you are aware, the vast majority of the numbers have to come between 72-92 for an average such as that. So we are looking at the oldest generation as being the risk to life category during this, numbers being over 40 thousand dead from the virus in this age range for the majority.
Compare that to 550000 a year that die from age related issues, specifically Dementia and Alziemers.
In terms of the numbers dying generally, 44 and under have seen next to no difference in deaths from before covid to during it. The amount a week has stayed pretty consistent which suggests that anyone in the age groups below 45 are not being affected unless special circumstances.
Side point, from the middle of June onward, general respiratory deaths have increased and surpassed Covid to the tune of 893 to 99 as of the week ending 11th September. That includes pneumonia , infections and anything in between.
Since the middle of August, we have seen a decrease of deaths per week by as much as 15%, or 1000 less a week. With no explanation as to why such a big drop based on the last 5 years.
So with all that being said. Given the price of locking down the country and applying so many measures is jobs, businesses , mental health, homes, losing loved ones without seeing them etc.
Are we right in locking the country down? Because, it seems the lockdown is to protect the one age group most likely to die? As statistics are showing that there is significantly less deaths for quite a lot of age groups, the most affected by locking down the country. Should we not be implementing protection for those vulnerable rather than locking down and restricting so much which is having a major impact on so many different factors.
The key point of topic here being the sickness vs death debate. If no-one was dying due to Covid-19, would we still be locking the country down?
The average age of death from Covid-19 is 82. So as you are aware, the vast majority of the numbers have to come between 72-92 for an average such as that. So we are looking at the oldest generation as being the risk to life category during this, numbers being over 40 thousand dead from the virus in this age range for the majority.
Compare that to 550000 a year that die from age related issues, specifically Dementia and Alziemers.
In terms of the numbers dying generally, 44 and under have seen next to no difference in deaths from before covid to during it. The amount a week has stayed pretty consistent which suggests that anyone in the age groups below 45 are not being affected unless special circumstances.
Side point, from the middle of June onward, general respiratory deaths have increased and surpassed Covid to the tune of 893 to 99 as of the week ending 11th September. That includes pneumonia , infections and anything in between.
Since the middle of August, we have seen a decrease of deaths per week by as much as 15%, or 1000 less a week. With no explanation as to why such a big drop based on the last 5 years.
So with all that being said. Given the price of locking down the country and applying so many measures is jobs, businesses , mental health, homes, losing loved ones without seeing them etc.
Are we right in locking the country down? Because, it seems the lockdown is to protect the one age group most likely to die? As statistics are showing that there is significantly less deaths for quite a lot of age groups, the most affected by locking down the country. Should we not be implementing protection for those vulnerable rather than locking down and restricting so much which is having a major impact on so many different factors.
The key point of topic here being the sickness vs death debate. If no-one was dying due to Covid-19, would we still be locking the country down?