Complain to Ofcom if you think they have broken any codes of practise. They haven't, your complaint will not be listened to.
The program included a direct violation of the code of practice for OFCOM, "Impartiality".
The program included a direct violation of the code of practice for OFCOM, "Impartiality". Such a serious claim .. a persons death warranted a balance .... There are balances available from scientists showing Lipoid Pneumonia can not be caused by vaping, which should have been aired .... If (and a big if) ITV were not aware of the available evidence they should have been, its what they are paid extraordinary amounts of money to do ...
That ITV were willing to clearly violate OFCOMS rules, shows that their Agenda outweighed the possibility or the consequences of their action.
People are free to think positively about that perverse program, that is their choice, but don't expect me to agree ....
In my opinion E Liquid is not made from oil !!! so if someone vapes oil based food flavoring mixed with nicotine they are not vaping E liquid ... If someone sells oil laced liquid with nicotine it is not E liquid .... The ITV did not say E liquid does not contain oil, they just said the man died 8 months after switching to E -cigs and a Doctor considered vaping had caused the Lipoid Pneumonia ... I'm sure the widow didn't know about this ailment or had considered E-cigs until the misinformed Doctor raised this suggestion ...
IF a man switched from alcohol to water (mixed with meths) and died six months later from kidney failure it would not be balanced to infer water may have been the cause!! and especially without pointing out that pure water is unlikely to cause kidney failure unless mixed with another substance.
If a Doctor had suggested such and ITV had reported it, even with the proviso and (pop ups) "it was not proven", we wouldn't be having this conversation.
There was no claim that any criminal gangs were selling oil laced liquid to the man or he was mixing oil with nicotine. If that was suspected it should have been raised in the program ... or the Doctors and the widows incorrect assumption shouldn't have been included !!!!
PS, would be nice if a Vendor sued ITV for Injurious/Malicious Falsehood.
I believe if a vendor had sold oil based e Liquid he would be guilty of a crime (even if he was unaware of the obvious dangers that are made clear by our own industry associations), the same as if I used meths in a soft drink.
No one can stop crooks or idiots putting the wrong things into products, the ITV don't run stories inferring wine may dangerous because some crooks mix it with anti freeze. or at least without pointing out that anti freeze is not a normal ingredient of wine produced by reputable vendors and is the action of crooks.