Vaping News

Pharma Glantz says PHE Ecig Report is Wrong

Vaping’s bête noir is back with another feeble attack and misrepresentation of the science.

Share on:
Stanton Glantz will never admit that he was wrong on the subject of vaping but his latest communication is evidence to the fact that his opinion is shifting. Vapers needn’t celebrate his Damascene conversion though; the mouth funded by Big Pharma is still bent on attacking the cause of harm reduction. His latest blog post is a combination of big words used for effect and abjectly miserable critique.

Imagine for a minute that you have spent seven years studying at university in order to gain your doctorate. You have spent further years in a laboratory honing your skills and countless hours at a keyboard writing up your work. How wonderfully rewarding it must be to have an expert such as Glantz read your paper and proclaim, with gravitas, that it: “has some nice graphs”. Hold on a second, it’s possible that “doctorate” has been confused with “Primary school holiday project”.

The coverage of a collection of research papers he presents follows up the risible modelling study he carried out. It too demonstrated a shift in focus for the ardent anti-vaping campaigner – but in doing so belies the new tactic. The hilarity invoked by his previous pronouncements and outright lies has clearly hit home. It has become apparent to him that a fear-driven strategy is not holding enough traction because of the extreme views he was putting across. The modelling study accepted some of the latest positive ecig findings but layered them with language loaded to advise continual caution.

The new tactic is continued in his blog: “Accumulating evidence suggests e-cigs 1/3 to 1/2 as bad as cigs (maybe higher)”. No longer trotting out a line that vaping wreaks all kinds of hazardous material and offers an exceptionally dangerous prospect, Glantz moves to acknowledging a reduction in harm. Unfortunately he can’t bring himself to shift position far enough.

In (embarrassingly) calling the “95% safer” figure cited by Public Health England and the Royal College of Physicians “evidence-free”, he goes on to unequivocally state it “is wrong”. Moreover, he writes: “The longer these organizations take to modify their positions on the emerging science the lower their credibility is becoming.” This is from a man who is held in such low regard eminent scientists and experts openly mock him at public gatherings. Quite how anybody who takes money from pharmaceutical companies and brazenly lies about vaping, without a second though for those who may continue to smoke as a result, has the audacity to question the integrity and credibility of others is anybody’s guess.

It is in his summation that he damns himself once more: “Given the evidence that effects on the cardiovascular system and lungs account for more than half the smoking-induced deaths and that at least some of the short-term effects of e-cigarette use on these systems are comparable to cigarettes, agencies concerned about public health should consider them at least 1/3 as bad as cigarettes and maybe as high as half as bad (or higher). And, that estimate if just for individuals using them, without accounting for the fact that e-cigarettes are attracting low risk kids and that kids who start with e-cigarettes are 3-4 times more likely to become cigarette smokers than those who don’t use e-cigarettes.”

His figure of 1/3-1/2 is totally fictional, as is the assertion that vaping is attracting children and leading them on to smoking. But then maybe we ought to listen to his criticism of the RCP and PHE reports? After all, he appears to be an expert in ‘evidence-free’.

Dave Cross avatar

Dave Cross

Journalist at POTV
View Articles

Dave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous vape companies to develop content for their websites.

Join the discussion

Product

Parliament Fears Two

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs faced questions from a Conservative MP and, oddly, a member of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Vaping News

Harm Reduction For The Rich

The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance

Vaping News

Sacrificing Health For 2p Cut

Tory Government alienates vaping voters with its mission to cut tax by an unaffordable 2p to attract voters by placing a tax on vape products in the forthcoming budget

Vaping News

Scotland Announces Single-Use Vape Action

A ban on the sale and supply of single-use vapes in Scotland is due to come into effect on 1 April 2025, under proposed legislation published today