The Californian/Australian study sets out the potential for harm at the beginning of the paper by selectively choosing studies to cite. “E-liquids have been shown to cause a widening range of effects beyond toxicity in cells, animal models, and humans,” they write. They illustrate the bias in the work by adding that eliquid is available in “entertaining, fruity, and sweet flavours” that makes them “more attractive to youth” and pose “a possible gateway to smoking”.
Team member Laura Crotty Alexander said: “Ninety-nine percent of e-cigarette liquids are flavoured. To create these flavour profiles, companies are adding multiple chemicals to achieve that 'perfect' taste. These chemicals have been found to be toxic to the lungs. When inhaled, they wreak havoc on the lungs and affect specialized protein levels that help keep the body's immune system on track.”
The team conveniently ignored that the protein they measured is not a unique response to vaping but to anything entering the lungs. They failed to relate their findings to tobacco use and the benefit of smoking cessation through switching to vaping.
They call for a restriction to simple, single flavours for eliquids.
South Florida’s group conveniently thinks “there was a 75% increase in ENDS use by high school students”.
“The health effects and particularly the cardiac toxicity of [vaping] remain incompletely understood,” and rather than measuring cardiac response to vaping over time in actual humans they decided they’d get better results from drowning cells in a petri dish and suffocating mice.
Ten, five-month-old mice were treated to vapour from a Smok Baby for 4.7 seconds every two minutes for two hours – for five days a week. For ten weeks! They ‘discovered’ mice exposed to vaping were more prone to an abnormal and dangerous heart rhythm disturbance.
The study’s principal investigator Sami Noujaim said: “Our findings in the cells and mice indicate that vaping does interfere with the normal functioning of the heart and can potentially lead to cardiac rhythm disturbances.”
It doesn’t take a scientist to work out that this is far in excess of how a vaper would use their equipment let alone subjecting this regime to a much smaller animal’s lung and heart.