What's new

South Africa halts Astra Zeneca Vaccine

"Misfit"

Veteran
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Messages
9,860
upload_2021-2-7_22-16-2.png
 
How can it “not halt it” when the virus has been rampant and they’ve only just begun inoculation?
 
Seems a bit silly if it still prevents severe cases and deaths. Could always carry on and just have a tweaked booster once one becomes available. Stopping the vaccination rollout seems foolish to me without a readily available alternative but then again I'm not a scientist or virologist.
 
Seems a bit silly if it still prevents severe cases and deaths. Could always carry on and just have a tweaked booster once one becomes available. Stopping the vaccination rollout seems foolish to me without a readily available alternative but then again I'm not a scientist or virologist.

Im guessing here, but suppose as this variant is rampant in their country..... if another vaccine can do the better job then they will go with that.... their scientists will know more, they will have their reasons
 
If anyone can't access the FT article..



South Africa halts rollout of AstraZeneca vaccine. Preliminary data find no effect on mild or moderate disease caused by local variant.

The South African government had been planning to begin jabs for frontline health workers this month using 1.5m doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine South Africa has moved to halt its rollout of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine after preliminary and limited evidence showed it failed to protect against mild and moderate forms of disease caused by a coronavirus variant first detected in the country. Distribution of the AstraZeneca jab, scheduled to begin this month, would be put on hold to study its effects including on severe cases in more detail “until the scientists give us clear indications as to what we need to do”, Zweli Mkhize, South Africa’s health minister, said on Sunday. A small trial led by Oxford university and South Africa’s Wits university found that the AstraZeneca vaccine had low efficacy against milder illness with the 501Y.V2 variant, according to findings first reported by the Financial Times on Saturday. The paper, which has not yet been peer reviewed, did not study the jab’s effects on stopping severe illness. The South African government had been planning to begin jabs for frontline health workers this month using 1.5m doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine that are being supplied by India’s Serum Institute. It will now accelerate rollout of other vaccines it has ordered. “We can still proceed with this rollout, but we need to do it wisely with a stepped approach,” said Salim Abdool Karim, chairman of South Africa’s ministerial advisory committee on Covid-19. Recommended Covid-19 vaccines Oxford/AstraZeneca jab fails to prevent mild and moderate Covid from S African strain, study shows Drugmakers and scientists have been racing to understand how far the 501Y.V2 variant may reduce the effectiveness of some vaccines because it has become dominant in South Africa and similar strains are being detected elsewhere in the world. Recent results for vaccines produced by Novavax and Johnson & Johnson have shown less effectiveness against 501Y.V2 than against other forms, but showed complete protection against severe Covid-19 regardless of the variant. South Africa is planning to accelerate rolling out the J&J single-shot vaccine to health workers after results showed that it offers strong protection against severe Covid-19 with 501Y.V2, said Glenda Gray, leader of J&J’s local trial. The country has so far secured 9m J&J doses and 20m doses of Pfizer’s vaccine. “What will be available to the health workers will be those vaccines” in the coming weeks, Mkhize said. J&J’s vaccine uses a similar design to AstraZeneca’s, which raises hopes that the latter is also effective against severe Covid-19, said Shabir Madhi, leader of the South African study. AstraZeneca said on Saturday that the South African study was limited by the fact that subjects were predominantly young, healthy adults and that numbers were small. No deaths or hospitalisations were recorded in the study, which involved more than 2,000 people with a median age of 31. The drugmaker said it believed its vaccine could still protect against severe disease caused by the 501Y.V2 variant, which has a mutation, E484K, that appears to neutralise antibodies. The mutation has also been detected in variants in Brazil and, in limited numbers, in the UK. What these results tell us is that we need to do everything we can to reduce circulation of the virus and delay mutations that may reduce the efficacy of existing vaccines World Health Organization AstraZeneca also said it believed other immune responses, such as T-cells, could offer protection against the worst of the disease when caused by this variant. The South African study was not designed to measure this response, and no data were available. However, initial data indicated those responses remained intact against the South African variant, AstraZeneca said. Both Oxford and AstraZeneca said they had begun tweaking their vaccine with a view to making it available in the autumn, if necessary. Late on Sunday, they had not responded to a request for comment on South Africa’s decision. The World Health Organization told the Financial Times it was important to determine effectiveness in preventing moderate and severe cases, given the South African trial’s small sample size and the low risk of severe disease to the participants. “What these results tell us is that we need to do everything we can to reduce circulation of the virus and delay mutations that may reduce the efficacy of existing vaccines,” the WHO said. “It also seems increasingly clear that manufacturers will have to adjust to the Covid-19 viral evolution, taking into account the latest variants for future booster shots.”
 
Back
Top Bottom