What's new

So what is the point?

But by that account , the minute we hit 30 million doses of it , the numbers plummeted.

I've seen it in the data in the hospitals I work in for the city, end of Feb 250 patients , month later 50.

It's not a coincidence vaccinating people has led to rates and numbers significantly dropping. Even during Feb when we were locked down numbers were still very high. Once you hit 50% of the population vaccinated , suddenly covid started dropping.

Which takes me back to my question. If lockdown is the reason for numbers to suddenly start dropping after we vaccinated half the population then what is the point in the vaccination and it's design to reduce rates and stop deaths? The very thing that has happened when it was given to every age group that was greatly affected by covid?

if you work in the NHS you would be privy to know the numbers of people having covid and see the decline in admissions from when the rollout of the vaccine started, the lockdown was to a. reduce transmission b. not to overwhelm the NHS with covid patients. but you are also aware that the covid jab won't work fully until week 4 hence why the rates didn't suddenly stop, injecting half the population has taken weeks to achieve with just one injection to be fully covered with 2 for 66 million people will take much longer, so the answer to your question is lockdown served a purpose until the vaccine started to ease the hospital rates the vaccine won't stop you catching covid 19 it will stop death and severe illness from it.

I'm sorry, but what is the point of the vaccination? the question is if you ask that why did you have them?
 
I'm curious how some of the most outspoken anti-vaccine speakers and writers manage to seemingly travel around the world without having the vaccines they would obviously need to travel to those countries? :hmm:
 
I'm curious how some of the most outspoken anti-vaccine speakers and writers manage to seemingly travel around the world without having the vaccines they would obviously need to travel to those countries? :hmm:

Jonathan pie made a brilliant point about anti-vaccine speakers they say the illnesses are a myth like measles mumps etc because the rest of us have had the vaccines i would expect its the same principle "i can go to that country as they have had a vaccine so I'm covered"
 
Does this help explain?

Surge testing may not be enough to curb Covid variants in UK, say scientists

Local restrictions may be needed, specialists warn, as South Africa strain is identified in London

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...h-to-curb-covid-variants-in-uk-say-scientists

PCR tests to identify the gnome that's a lot of lab work, there is only so many times the virus can mutate I read a report whilst on a break about mutations and the virus mutating he's a tricky little critter like a bad pod system he keeps on producing shite mutant pods....

but the fear i have is that one day the virus will mutate with another virus and change the code completely the vaccines at the moment are standing up well if this virus caused more death and was stronger that wouldn't be bad there would be horrible death but it would burn itself out like murs and sars covid 1 but if we got less death and a r nought of 5.0 then that it would be horrific it would kill millions the sick and old mainly
 
U.K. data -

B2F52EC1-65C9-46C3-82B8-34D173FE3A92.jpeg
 
Heard on BBC news this morning that the thinking now is that one jab of Pfizer or AZ reduces transmission of about 50%.

Edit. It's a study by PHE.
 
Last edited:
Heard on BBC news this morning that the thinking now is that one jab of Pfizer or AZ reduces transmission of about 50%.

Edit. It's a study by PHE.
I read the same
 
Back
Top Bottom