POTV - Your vaping community

Wanting to join the rest of our members? Why not sign up today!

Register

A sensible (small) study reported with sensationalism?

Discussion in 'In The News' started by pete146, Aug 14, 2018.

  1. pete146

    pete146 Postman

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2015
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    231
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Cliffyboy1962

    Cliffyboy1962 Achiever

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,815
    Likes Received:
    1,227
    Yeah, just read that and whilst I was happy to try and read the detail of the study in the medical Journal "Thorax" I was, as usual, upset by the BBC article's headline and opening words.

    [​IMG]
    E-cigarettes 'more harmful than we think'
    E-cigarette vapour disables important immune cells in the lung and boosts inflammation.

    No use of a question mark. It totally reads like a statement of fact. The vaping nay-sayers will definitely latch onto this kind of journalism and say "There you go FACT. Vaping more harmful than you think"
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. BattleVape

    BattleVape Postman

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2014
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    102
    Sadly it's gained a bit of traction this morning it's also present in the telegraph and the daily mail.
     
  4. ObiWanVaponi

    ObiWanVaponi Achiever

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    1,049
    Likes Received:
    793
    The guy they quote in the article, Martin Dockrell, has just been on BBC Breakfast and literally the first thing out of his mouth was "we've known about this research for TWO YEARS" so they are clearly just raking up old news. He also repeated his quote of "Any smoker considering e-cigarettes should switch completely without delay."

    I don't think Dan and Louise were expecting him to be pro-vaping actually, they seemed quite surprised by what he was saying.
     
  5. JustDave

    JustDave Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2013
    Messages:
    4,371
    Likes Received:
    2,556
    This is exactly what I came back to say. Pretty well presented by the guy.

    Old study. Pretty well disputed by newer studies that have been done, even in the US where they seem to hate vaping even more than here. Stand by the RCS report that says at least 95% safer.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. anthonyb

    anthonyb Achiever

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,404
    Likes Received:
    546
    The moment I read the line " as opposed to cigarette vapour" it got filed in the usual bin. And I'll be taking no further interest in it.
     
  7. pete146

    pete146 Postman

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2015
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    231
    I don't understand why so many of us want to dismiss anything that suggests that vaping can have a negative effect. Yes Vaping is 95% safer than cigarettes we all know this.

    We all know that smokers should switch to vaping - but that's not because vaping is 100% safe, it's because it reduces the risk of potential harm. I welcome anything that helps to inform me in a reasonable way of what the potential harm may be, so that I can make informed choices!

    I actually also welcome news coverage that actually links the the scientific paper - all of the data is there to be seen and scrutinised. The problem is that the media know that fear sells - so they take a rational and reasonable piece of research and insist on inventing a sexy / scary headline for it!

    The scientists involved are not saying 'vaping is bad' or ' quit vaping' - They are simply saying 'we've done a small study and noticed something, this could do with being looked into more - but still switch to vaping if you smoke'. Surely that's exactly the sort of thing people should want to see happening?

    PS - I can't see a date for when the study was carried out, but the paper was originally submitted for review in Feb 2018.
     
    #7 pete146, Aug 14, 2018
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2018
    • Like Like x 3
  8. Lord Grim

    Lord Grim Achiever

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    4,325
    Likes Received:
    2,306
    I don't think the complaints here are about the research itself, but about the sensationalist reporting of it. You nailed it in the third paragraph.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  9. Mawsley

    Mawsley Putting the soup into super hero

    Joined:
    May 14, 2013
    Messages:
    20,658
    Likes Received:
    10,310
    *Puts fingers in ears and goes to make bacon*

    I’m so bored of the BBC. I remember when they used to do news, but it’s now only done with any semblance of professionalism on Channel 4. Sensationalist bullshit and propaganda is all it does now.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  10. Couldn't agree more. Apart from local radio I have long since ditched the BBC.
     

Share This Page